~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~
How I Came to Love Chaucer's English
Becoming a Fan
I was in the ninth grade. My
girlfriend, Jackie, was in seventh. One day Jackie said she had something
serious to discuss with me. She asked me if I had ever heard of an old poet
named Geoffrey Chaucer. I told her I hadn't.
Jackie thought that since I
had two more years of English classes than she did, I might have information
that could solve a problem for her. We found a quiet spot in the woods near
where we lived and she told me the serious matter.
She had heard that this old poet, Chaucer, had used the
word "fart" in one of his stories, which were
called tales. Logically, we knew this could not be true. Jackie explained that
Chaucer was even older than Shakespeare. Both Shakespeare and Chaucer, we knew
from our English classes, lived way back when English was a pure, golden
language. Authors were serious. They did not write about trivial matters, as
contemporary authors did.
My English class had just
read Shakespeare's Julius Caesar,
a serious play full of golden language. Nothing trivial about it and
definitely, no jokes. We thought of modern literature as the books we found
under Jackie's older brothers' mattresses — Mickey Spillane's
I, the Jury, which even had a sex scene, and the soon to
scandalize everyone Peyton Place,
set in a small town like ours where everyone was doing everything we whispered
about and weren't supposed to understand at all. No pure, golden language
there! Spillane and Metalious might have written "fart."
Shakespeare and Chaucer never could. What Jackie heard couldn't possibly
be true. But all the same, we wanted to check it out.
On the way to the library, Jackie filled me in.
She had heard that Chaucer said "fart" in a story called
"The Miller's Tale" from a book called The Canterbury Tales.
At the library, we headed straight for the card
catalog. Dewey decimal number in hand, we made for the middle of the library
past the librarians' desk, and went down a set of beautiful frosted glass
stairs to the Literature Section in the basement. There we found The
Canterbury Tales without trouble,
saw "The Miller's Tale" in the Table of Contents, turned to
the appropriate page, and started scanning.
There it was! Plain to see!
The word "fart" right there in the text! Wow! We were excited!
Just as we were beginning to
scan the text for the plot, the largest, sternest member of the library staff
appeared at the top of the staircase. Dressed in basic black and speaking
vociferously, she snatched the book out of our hands as soon as she got to the
bottom of the stairs. With considerable drama, she pointed upward to a sign on
a chain that was supposed to hang across the stairway to the Literature
Section: NO ONE UNDER EIGHTEEN ALLOWED. She could not imagine why the chain
dangled down from one ring only, though she did not blame us overtly for
removing it. We'd never seen the chain at all. I thought to myself that
probably a staff member with a heavy load of books to reshelve forgot
about the stupid thing, but I said nothing.
My first lesson in Chaucer
was thus ended. But I became a fan.
Six Years Later
I was a sophomore in
college. Part of our literature survey class included excerpts from The
Canterbury Tales. I was thrilled. We
had a wonderful instructor, Winthrop Walker Piper III,
called "Win" by his friends, and "Mr. Piper" by us.
He taught enthusiastically and knew how to
relate to students without condescension. Each meeting of his class was a
delight, plus he and I were the only two people on campus to ride
bicycles. To be stylish, you
either walked — carrying your books in just such and such a way
on one hip, or,
if you were lucky, you got a ride in one of the "fraternity boys'"
cars — a rarity, and especially cool if you got a ride in a
convertible, an Edsel, or if you "stepped down into a Hudson."
Mr. Piper and I often waved
to each other as we biked from home to classrooms or simply rode around town
to be out in the fresh air.
I was fascinated by the
structure of The Canterbury Tales and
by the fact that, like the Ten Commandments, the number of Canterbury pilgrims
stated in one place is not the same as stated in another. Some years before, I
had checked the Bible out, having questions about a few of the commandments,
and could not find the list of ten. I gave up, unaware that such a list does
not exist!
But The Canterbury Tales were a lovely challenging adventure,
not a dry set of
DOs and DON'Ts. I dove in,
making my own choices of which pilgrims
were where when, and created an artwork showing a long procession including
all of them. I used pen and ink on stiff board and colored the results as
best I knew of Medieval European costume from Maxfield Parrish, N. C. Wyeth,
and other romantic illustrators of my parents' generation. I gave the set
to Mr. Piper. He was the one other person I knew who was enthusiastic
about the subject.
A university course
specifically about Chaucer was given every other year, but I was not able to
fit it into my course schedule. Yet my quest continued.
Another Six Years Later
I was now living in San
Francisco. One of my housemates went to San Francisco State. It was
inexpensive, $45 a semester for part-time students, $96 a semester for full
time. I knew I did not want to be a full time student. I needed time to
explore the world. I'd spent a couple of years doing office work and found it
deadening. I supported myself doing child care and housework. This covered my
living expenses: $25 a month for my room in a six room flat at Ord and 17th
Street, $5 a week into our household kitty for food — I did most of the
shopping on Castro Street when it was called Eureka Valley, and the rest for
art supplies and savings. We were brought up to save 25% of whatever came in
and this worked beautifully for some decades.
There were two things I
wanted very much to learn in the 1960s: Chaucer and weaving. I went to San
Francisco State and took both. I totally lucked out on my teachers: master
weaver Margery Livingston and folklorist/historical linguist Niel K. Snortum.
Five days a week for six
weeks in Mr. Snortum's summer school class, we read Chaucer —
at home and at school, silently and out loud. Prof. Snortum taught us
how language changes, on what principles it changes. He gave us
memorable etymologies, filled us in on plots and culture, and
encouraged us to do our own digging into the past. I was hooked.
This was the antithesis of humorless speech from a golden age of
formality and stratospheric ideals. It was literature pulsing with
the present, with humanity, wit, story telling, flowing rhyme,
and lots of laughs.
I went on to study Old English with Prof. Snortum
and to study other medieval English writers with his
colleague, John Gardner, who was soon to tell the world he was a novelist as
well as a Medievalist.
I gave papers at
professional meetings, read my own poetry inspired by work of Chaucer's time,
and created many hand lettered texts inspired by styles from Medieval Europe.
My interest in Chaucer and
his contemporaries remained strong.
Into the New Millennium
Many years of living in San
Francisco were followed by exploring the warm outdoors feel of a cottage in
Oakland's Dimond District (yes, that's Dimond without an "a").
When I moved
from Oakland to Emeryville in 1996, I pared down my possessions. I would be
sharing a house with my sweetheart and other housemates. We needed space for
all. Something had to go. The Scroungers Center for Reusable Art Parts (SCRAP)
in San Francisco and the East Bay Depot for Creative Reuse got many potential
art materials I had saved for good, but nebulous, future projects.
People's Park got clothes. I
could not believe that giving away clothes would be difficult. One agency
wanted things only for babies and toddlers. Another only took next-to-new.
Almost nothing I had was new enough to be next-to-new. An agency in Berkeley
that took clothes for homeless women would not take my skirts. A staff member,
wearing a skirt of swirling taffeta, told me, with an air like the librarian
who marched Jackie and me out of the Literature Section of my childhood
hometown library, "They don't
wear skirts." So the clothes I wanted to give away went to
People's Park and were quickly accepted.
I exchanged books for credit
at Moe's Books in Berkeley. I filled my home garbage can every week for a
month. I told myself that anything I would take with me to Emeryville was a
project I was going to finish.
One such project had to do
with Middle English. My library of books on Chaucer, The Gawain Poet, the
Pearl Poet, and the author of The Cloud of Unknowing
stayed with me.
In 2007 I met Robin Goodfellow, music teacher extraordinaire.
Robin taught piano and recorder. She had a recital
coming up and invited me to read a little Middle English to go with the
recorder music. My audience was composed of students from six years old to
adulthood, with many parents and grandparents in attendance. To relax
performers before the recital, Robin had collage materials set out. Cards and
wall pieces came into being almost instantly. We all had a fine time.
I read stanzas from The
Pearl in a mix of modern and Middle
English, while a tray of gems was passed around —
gems that are part of a Medieval poetic dream landscape: silver leaves,
indigo tree trunks, paths of crushed pearl, bright colored gems in
a rushing brook, and many more. The children stayed interested because
they could handle the rocks and metals being passed around.
Over refreshments after the performance,
grandparents recited their favorite stanzas from Chaucer.
True to principles of
historical linguistics I learned from Niel Snortum, many of us had developed
our own far flung dialects of Middle English and needed to listen carefully
to comprehend one another's Chaucer. Smiles were everywhere and the poetry
goes on.
In 2009 I joined Pinole Artisans in
mural-friendly, artistically dynamic, peaceable Pinole Old Town. Invited to
join by virtual poet laureate Claire J. Baker, I exhibited paintings in a
spring group show. Preparing for a second group exhibit, gallery director
Joan Landis suggested I display some poetry. Claire has exhibited framed
poems on fine papers in Pinole and Berkeley. I decided on short poems,
lettered and drawn by hand. The show went up July 9, 2009.
The reception was on July 11.
The short version of this story is on my website:
"This is the first time since the 1960s that an
exhibition facility has been forward looking enough and interdisciplinary
enough to show Tanya's work of this kind."
And there is a backstory. At
San Francisco State in the 1960s, photographer Frances Rodgers and I
designed a year long series of exhibits for the library titled
"Language in a Visual Setting."
Niel Snortum, Wilder Bentley, Sr., and other professors wrote letters
of recommendation for our project. We created display space with sculpture,
textiles, and plants, so that guests to the exhibit walked through
meaningfully arranged space, not simply a sterile interior.
On the walls were both paintings and lettered texts.
I did the lettered texts adapted from Medieval models.
I wanted readable, visually interesting compositions with prose
and poetry from Chaucer's time to the trendy Beatles,
including some of my own writing as well.
In connection with the
exhibits, artists Barbara Hammett, Poe Potter, Sheila Sullivan and I put on
outdoor performances of plays by John Lennon, bringing varieties of English
into the present moment. In the Gallery Lounge we presented a workshop on
free style lettering, based on Medieval manuscripts and modern alphabets
designed to provide one symbol for one sound (for example, there would be
different A forms for the A in "at" and the A in "ate").
Frances and I took a binder
about our series to a prominent museum where we had been given an
introduction to the head curator. The curator told us the museum had
no interest in the type of thing we were doing. A few months later,
the same museum mounted its "first ever" exhibit of
illuminated Islamic manuscripts combined in an interesting
physical environment with textiles, photographs, and ceramics.
In the 1970s, Alfred Frankenstein reviewed a San Francisco
solo exhibit in which I had paintings and text. Frankenstein was,
at the time, the chief art and music critic in the City.
He was also a noted art historian. His review praised my painting
technique as "brilliant," but said the text accompanying
the paintings had to go. Words with paintings were considered
a "crutch." Mark Linenthal, head of the Creative
Writing section of San Francisco State's English Department had told me the
same thing. With a gorgeous page from an illuminated manuscript of The
Canterbury Tales behind him,
Linenthal told me that visual images with words were "a crutch."
The 1980s were encouraging
on many grounds, but not where combining words and images is concerned.
Soon after I moved my studio to The Point in San Francisco's Hunters Point
Shipyard, I hired a recommended art consultant to help me with the
business of art. He told me my "poetic" painting titles had
to go. No more quotes from Wallace Stevens or e. e. cummings.
Painting titles such as "Number Three" were what was wanted.
It would be twenty more years before my
Chaucer-based painted poetry would hang on the walls of another
gallery — in The Pinole Art Center exhibit,
"The Magic of Color,"
July 9 through September 10, 2009.
~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ · ~